Editor’s Note: This is the first in a two part series on the stigma of chronic pain. This focuses on the chronic pain patient. The second installment features the stigma of being a pain physician. We invite your comments.
These are challenging days. Persons who suffer with chronic and intractable pain are facing widespread public misunderstanding of the difference between physical dependence on a drug to treat addiction and a chronic illness.
Physicians and policy wonks are just as confused. Prescriptions are reducing but deaths are increasing. Despite the fact that addiction in persons with chronic pain is consistently reported at less than 4% of the population of patients, many fear that anyone taking opioid medications is at risk for addiction, leading to behaviors associated with overdose, suicide, or other negative outcomes. Physicians who prescribe for complex patients are being stigmatized by their peers as ‘aberrant prescribers.’
The selective misapplication of scientific reporting is leading to the revision of treatment protocols using addiction guidelines. Some consumers successfully rely on protocols that use a combination of nonpharmacological methods or medical marijuana where available. It should go without saying that most consumers who depend on controlled substances for palliation are restricted by choices related to payor sources, or have failed many prior treatment protocols, settling on prescribed opioids used alone or in combination with other adjuvants. Consumers who find themselves facing removal of successful treatment protocols without alternatives, legitimately fear that the public cure for addiction will force out individual consequences and treatment more harmful than the use of controlled substances.
The language we use frames what the public thinks about substance use and recovery. It affects how individuals think about themselves and their own ability to effect change or assert control over treatment outcomes. It is important to clearly understand the terms used to describe this problem.
Addiction is a neurobiological brain disease that has genetic, psychosocial, and environmental factors. It is characterized by one or more of the following behaviors:
- Poor control over drug use
- Compulsive drug use
- Continued use of a drug despite physical, mental and/or social harm
- A craving for the drug
Chronic pain is pain that results from a discrete event, that lasts for more than 90 days without resolution. It ranges from mild to severe and is in many cases, associated with a progressive underlying disease process. Intractable pain is distinguished by measured changes to one or multiple organ systems that occur as the result of prolonged, undertreated chronic pain.
Physical dependence is the body’s adaptation to a particular drug. In other words, the individual’s body gets used to receiving regular doses of a certain medication provided for a specific and legitimate purpose. When the medication is abruptly stopped or the dosage is reduced too quickly, the person will experience withdrawal symptoms while the purpose for which the drug is prescribed is still present. A number of other drugs not associated with opioids or addiction can also result in physical dependence (i.e., antidepressants, beta blockers, corticosteroids, etc.) and can trigger unpleasant withdrawal symptoms when stopped abruptly.
Tolerance is a condition that occurs when the body adapts or gets used to a particular medication, lessening its effectiveness. When that happens, it is necessary to either increase the dosage, switch to another type of medication in order to maintain pain relief, or employ an adjunctive therapy.
Pseudoaddiction is a term used to describe patient behaviors that may occur when their pain is not being treated adequately. Patients who are desperate for pain relief may watch the clock until time for their next medication dose and do other things that would normally be considered “drug seeking” behaviors, such as taking medications not prescribed to them, taking illegal drugs, or using deception to obtain medications. The difference between pseudoaddiction and true addiction is that the behaviors stop when the patient’s pain is effectively treated.
Stigma refers to the negative attitudes expressed by members of the community, including healthcare professionals, that result in discrimination and devaluation of the individual solely because of their characteristics. Appropriate use of language in is important. Inappropriate use of language leads our thinking and expectations and can negatively impact the way society perceives both addiction and chronic pain.
Negative labels impose the mark of deviance that deprives people of individual qualities and identity. Stigmatizing labels cause us to explain away illness symptoms through beliefs that have nothing to do with the facts of the person or the causes for their chronic illness or addiction.
Assigning ‘marks’ and ‘red flags,’ we employ labels to deny the real conditions of daily life for persons living with chronic pain. Professionals are trained to believe that ‘catastrophizing’ is an aberrant behavior associated with drug seeking, rather than understanding that it is a plea to be taken seriously as a person who is under treated for pain. Pain attributed to ‘somatoform disorder’ becomes the ‘mark’ of psychological illness rather than an indication that the physician has failed to pursue a diagnosis because they have misinterpreted your symptoms by exercising their own faulty beliefs. A person who drives more than 50 miles to fill a prescription may not have access to a provider who will take their insurance, may lack access to a pharmacy that will stock their medications or absent insurance, accept cash.
Stigma is harmful, distressing, and marginalizing to the individuals, groups, and populations who bear the burden of negative labels. It also results in misdiagnosis, wrong diagnosis and under treatment. It may lead the provider to select the wrong treatment protocols resulting in treatment failure or patient harm. It may result in the consumer losing any confidence in the possibility of establishing a healthy working relationship with providers.
At all levels of this discussion, we must employ safeguards to protect patients from the inappropriate use of stigmatizing language – through our guidelines, our interpersonal interactions, and our public language. Now more than ever, we must resist the use of the ‘mark’ to dictate how we deliver competent healthcare.
Editor’s Note: Part Two will feature Dr. David Nagel.