Kids with Migraines Might Want to Turn to Sugar Pills

Kids with Migraines Might Want to Turn to Sugar Pills

by Staff

Prescription medicine used to treat migraines in children are no more effective than placebo sugar pills, says a study in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The study showed no significant differences among amitriptyline, topiramate and placebo in reducing headache days or related disability.

“The study was intended to demonstrate which of the commonly used preventive medications in migraine was the most effective. What we found is that we could prevent these headaches with either a medication or a placebo,” says Andrew Hershey, MD, PhD, co-director of the Cincinnati Children’s Headache Center and senior author of the study.

“This study suggests that a multi-disciplinary approach and the expectation of response is the most important, not necessarily the prescription provided,” he added.

The 24-week clinical trial included 328 eligible pediatric patients. The trial used a clinically meaningful endpoint of a 50 percent or greater reduction in headache days from the 28 days prior to randomization to the final four weeks of the 24-week study.

The surprise finding was that 61 percent of kids taking a placebo saw the days they had a headache reduced by 50 percent or more.

For the two medication groups, 52 percent of those taking amitriptyline and 55 percent of those taking topiramate had this level of reduced headache days.

The rates among the three groups were not statistically different.

Compared to placebo, those on the two active drugs had a significantly higher rate of side effects, including fatigue, dry mouth and, in three cases, mood alteration. Thirty-one percent of those on topiramate had paresthesia - a “pins and needles” tingling in the hands, arms, legs or feet.

These results create a bit of a conundrum given that it is not ethical to prescribe placebo without a patient’s knowledge, and it may be the expectation of reduced migraine may override the actual effects of the medicines.

“Our national team was hoping to develop evidence to drive the choice by medical providers of the first line prevention medication for helping youth with migraine, but the data showed otherwise,” said Scott Powers, PhD, pediatric psychologist, co-director of the headache center at Cincinnati Children’s, and first author of the paper.

“We see this as an important opportunity for health care providers, scientists, children, and families because our findings suggest a paradigm shift. First line prevention treatment will involve a multidisciplinary team approach and focus on non-pharmacological aspects of care. The good news is we can help children with migraines get better,” he added.

Powers says the study also underscores the importance of conducting more research with a developmental focus on children and young adults to allow innovations that can be applied directly to pediatric chronic illnesses.

“The interpretation of these results is very challenging. In most situations, trials that fail to show benefit of an intervention do so because study participants do not improve. That was not the situation here. A majority of all study participants improved, regardless of their assigned treatment group,” says Chris Coffey, PhD, director of the CTSDMC and professor of biostatistics in the University of Iowa’s College of Public Health, and lead statistician for the study.

“Further research is needed to better understand the results and to determine what future strategies might optimize the treatment of headaches in these childhood and adolescent populations,” he added.

Subscribe to our blog via email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Authored by: Staff

newest oldest
Notify of

I feel sad for those poor kids. I have had severe migraines since age three…in the 1950s. Was diagnosed by a very good pediatrician, who cared for me with kindness but only offered aspirin, cold cloths/icebags and a vomit bucket. I have always had an “aura” with the headache, which, as a child, I could not explain nor describe.
I question how effective studies with children can be. Children tend to want to please adults, want to “give the right answer.”
I have never been able to make a migraine get better through positive expectations/placebo effect.


So a child is just supposed to suffer? I agree that most of the cr*p they give specifically for migraine is very dangerous but have migraine variant headaches myself for close to fifty years I wouldn’t let anyone except members of the CDC , fda and other government agencies go through them without something for the pain. It’s inhumane! If something natural works that’s good but if not pain control is desperately needed!


I don’t care what any study or professional says. Having suffered from migraines since age 12 (I am now 63), I wouldn’t give my child any medicine except in very, very extreme cases. Look at all the harm so many medicines have done to those of us who now know what we were taking. I’d go with natural approaches no matter what. As there are so many kinds of migraines, in my experience, I’ve had them when a medicine worked on the first try, I’ve had the ones that last a year and the ones when any movement, light, noise, etc. was only going to make them worse. I’ve had many when movement — like a good sweat from some hard yard work took them away. Countless ED visits were necessary also. But I don’t like the idea of medicating a child except in the extreme.


OMG Christine I hadn’t heard about that! It’s unconscioable what ” human beings” can do to one another!


So now the government is going to advocate child abuse as well as genocide? If the only medication kids get for migraine are amitriptyline and topiramate too many children aren’t being effectively treated in the first place! How can the medical professionals and the government live with themselves when they allow children to suffer?

Christine taylor

These quacks should not be practicing. When I see studies such as this i cant help but believe they took what they thought might be the outcome and came up with the questions and interpretted the answers so that what they thought might come to be the answer. I recall a case at sick kids in Toronto where some psychologists thought the illness was in the child’s head and the poor kid suffered and died. When he threw up nurses made him clean the vomit off the floor. How many kids will suffer because someone wanted their name in print as a “ground breaking” treatment.